sexual commerce

Presuming your definition of conventional is the, well, conventional one, threesomes and sexual commerce would seem to be at odds with it.

Kavita Ilona Nayar, a doctoral student at the University of Massachusetts-Amherst whose research focuses on digital cultures of sexual commerce, has written that “in an economic and cultural environment that encourages an ethos of individualism and entrepreneurialism, selling sex and intimacy makes sense. So, why the continued stigma?”

Mr. King seems to believe that victimization is inherent in sexual commerce.

Her definition of “improper sexual commerce” included that “which is claimed by legal right, as in marriage, second, where the female, to please the male, accords it” as a duty and without love.

I’d welcome the Republican National Committee, and challenge the media to take its sexual commerce seriously.